That is purported to be the "visit" powder-or darn close to it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge a single could handload. It truly is the muse for countless pet loads, yet I have not been content with the outcome.
I'd say you'd be better off looking at if someone can be ready to trade you some Varget to your H4831SC.
What is the primary difference? Compression. Without the Intense/large compression connected to the extensive grain 7828, the tension curve was altered as well as load fell aside.
Certainly you can. These are a similar exact powder however the SC powder is just Minimize shorter so it meters superior.
Anyway, I realized the two lbs . of H4831SC applied the identical data, but I did not know no matter if there was just about anything diverse involving a pound of powder labeled "Excessive" and 1 not so labeled. A phone to Hodgdon confirmed they have been in reality equivalent and the only real variance was The emblem about the label.
Any load data to assist that? My 1st assumed is it isn't really intending to melt away many of the way and velocities are going to be sluggish and all over. May very well be a pleasant fireworks Show!
I'm working with it with a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as correct. RL22 did very well but I had been a bit concerned about temp security. I do think I'm at 72 grains and obtain all over 2850ish fps
excaliber h4831sc mentioned: I have observed the exact reverse for being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Acquire Mag.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t happy with the velocity. After months, I obtained lucky and caught some H1000 on line not to mention paid a little bit further. The very upcoming week at a gun clearly show a guy experienced a complete situation of H1000 for $forty for every h4831 vs h4831sc 1lb. I fail to remember how much, but Together with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.
Why would I mention this? Just what exactly h4831sc load data is my stage? I'm undecided that there is a actual legitimate position in addition to what exactly is preferred with most has not been well-known with me in the slightest degree in these situations. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or a little something? Just to demonstrate how outrageous I actually am, tomorrow I am variety screening a good friends new .
As with the 4831 vs 4831SC, They may be precisely the same/similar powder cept for grain measurement. Load data is interchangeable.
The "SC" stands for Shorter Lower. I haven't observed a distinction between possibly powder dut I don't Assume I would combine them.
arkansas or ohio i never ever found a distinction aside from the common is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.
I discovered that my 7mag 160 partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with very low to min expenses. I’m conversing 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it absolutely was a minimal 60s grain demand inside of a Norma situation. Not what I had been looking for, but precise nonetheless.